Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Obama With Turban


Photo of Obama With Turban Causes Stir
By JIM KUHNHENN,
AP
Posted: 2008-02-25 21:58:08
Filed Under: Elections News, Barack Obama
WASHINGTON (Feb. 25) - A photograph circulating on the Internet of Democratic Sen. Barack Obama dressed in traditional local garments during a visit to Kenya in 2006 is causing a dustup in the presidential campaign over what constitutes a smear.
American PoliticiansIn Traditional Garb

In a controversy over what may or may not be a smear tactic, campaign managers for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are arguing over a photo of the Illinois senator that's making the Internet rounds. The picture of Obama, above, shows him wearing traditional garments in Wajir, Kenya, during his trip to his father's homeland in 2006.
The Associated Press photograph portrays Obama wearing a white turban and a wraparound white robe presented to him by elders in Wajir, in northeastern Kenya. Obama's estranged late father was Kenyan and Obama visited the country in 2006, attracting thousands of well-wishers.The gossip and news Web site The Drudge Report posted the photograph Monday and said it was being circulated by "Clinton staffers" and quoted an e-mail from an unidentified campaign aide. Drudge did not include proof of the e-mail in the report."I just want to make it very clear that we were not aware of it, the campaign didn't sanction it and don't know anything about it," Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson said in a teleconference with reporters. "None of us have seen the e-mail in question. If anybody has independent reporting that they've done on it I would welcome it."

Also See: Fear Lingers Over Obama's Safety Farrakhan Praises Obama's Candidacy


In an article on Aol.com Obama states that it was no big deal. The head turban was a gift like the Koran his father gave him. The same one he studied from in the school he went to in Wajir when he was a kid. He was tough to hate the USA and all other that didn’t belive in Islam. He is a realitivly new covert to Christianity.

Do you really want him a President of our country?
It’s bad enough we had eight years of moran who didn’t know how to run this country. We don’t need any simpleton in the White House . Things are to dangerious in World. We need someone with expreance!

Saturday, January 26, 2008

WHO IS BARACK OBAMA




WHO IS BARACK OBAMA
Very interesting and something that should be considered in your choice. If you do not ever forward anything else, please forward this to all your contacts...this is very scary to think of what lies ahead of us here in our own United States...better heed this and pray about it and share it. We checked this out on 'snopes.com'. It is factual. Check for yourself. Who is Barack Obama? Probable U. S. presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., a black MUSLIM from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white ATHEIST from Wichita, Kansas. Obama's parents met at the University of Hawaii. When Obama was two years old, his parents divorced. His father returned to Kenya. His mother then married Lolo Soetoro , a RADICAL Muslim from Indonesia.? When Obama was 6 years old, the family relocate to Indonesia. Obama attended a MUSLIM school in Jakarta. He also spent two years in a Catholic school. Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim. He is quick to point out that, 'He was once a Muslim, but that he also attended Catholic school.'Obama's political handlers are attempting to make it appear that that he is not a radical. Obama's introduction to Islam came via his father, and that this influence was temporary at best. In reality, the senior Obama returned to Kenya soon after the divorce, and never again had any direct influence over his son's education. Lolo Soeto ro, the second husband of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, introduced his stepson to Islam. Obama was enrolled in a Wahabi school in Jakarta. Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad against the western world. Since it is politically expedient to be a CHRISTIAN when seeking major public office in the United States, Barack Hussein Obama has joined the United Church of Christ in an attempt to downplay his Muslim background. ALSO, keep in mind that when he was sworn into office he DID NOT use the Holy Bible, but instead the Koran. Barack Hussein Obama will NOT recite the Pledge of Allegiance nor will he show any reverence for our flag. While others place their hands over their hearts, Obama turns his back to the flag and slouches. Let us all remain alert concerning Obama's expected presidential candidacy. The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level - through the President of the United States, one of their own!!!!


Commentary Herb A Krantz

This was sent to me in an email so I went on the internet and read other articles about this subject especially from CNN.
I don’t like Obama as president to begin with. He has no background in politics to get anything done. Whether we like it or not you have to know how to get around Capital hill. Look what we ended up with the last eight years.
Times are dangerous now and we need experience not a novas’. And we sure as hell do not need a Muslim in the White House. Obama Hessian should go back to his senate seat and learn what America Is all about. Freedom for all not for just one god, religion or race. I don’t fell safe around any person that comes from Asian or Arab countries.
I haven’t always felt this way, it’s just since 911. I find it hard to trust someone who may want to kill me.
I also think that the majority of the African American voters will vote for Obama just because he is black, not because he is the best person for the job. Again the religious right voted for Bush and look what happen. We as a country can’t afford that again.
It’s time we voted with logic not pure emotions. With our brains not our harts.
So go out and vote.

Saturday, December 8, 2007

The Terrorist Cells Are Already Here While More Are Coming



Recently, the US media have been reporting that Al Qaeda plans to strike the U.S., possibly this summer, and many of us are all a-twitter about this shocking news. Yet with a series of eye-opening questions and facts, FSM Contributing Editor Dr. Walid Phares explains why this should be no news at all.

The Terrorist Cells Are Already Here While More Are Coming

By Dr. Walid Phares

The current media rush to interpret what the US Government is releasing in terms of potential infiltration by an al Qaeda cell (or cells) to strike this summer is warranted but still unfocused. ABC News and AP have reported new official "concerns" of an attack on the US homeland this summer. ABC specified that (according to its sources) the Terrorists intend to attack a Government facility. Furthermore, as reported widely in the press, "new intelligence suggests a small al Qaeda cell is on its way to the US, or may already be here." The report added that the White House has convened an urgent multi-agency meeting for Thursday afternoon “to address ways to minimize or counter the threat, and steps to harden and protect Government facilities."The report quoted a former FBI agent (and ABC Terrorism expert) analyzing the potential threat by stating that the target is a Government building. ABC told its viewers that the tactics by the London attackers provided clues that are being used to decode other emails, etc. Even further AP reported that US Counter Terrorism officials have warned that al Qaeda has "interest in attacking in the summer time." Added to this salad of analysis, was the news about a previous video showing a "graduation" by the Taliban in Pakistan. And to season it, two more leads were added: One was the Daily Telegraph story about the 45 doctors who were planning on attacking a US military target in Florida and a Sky News report about British Pastor Canon Andrew White who has said of an April discussion with al Qaeda "representative" who told him "the killing will start in the UK and the US." So in short, based on these "reports," US media are telling their audiences (from their Government sources) the following:1) A Graduation has occurred in Pakistan (they showed the footage) and Jihadists are on their way to the West.2) A Pastor has met an al Qaeda representative who told him operations are underway.3) American analysts looked at the British Jihadists’ tactics over the past few weeks and "learned" something new. Something that taught them how to better read information they already had. 4) A media report said 45 doctors were to prepare an attack against a US base. 5) Hence, the conclusion is that a cell, or more, is on its way to the US. And according to a general mood, it was concluded that summers are better for Jihadists to attack. But if the reader would re-read those five points he/she may ask many troubling questions. I have the following ones:
A) What if the footage of the "Taliban graduation" aired by a TV network wasn't obtained and thus wasn't shown to the American public? Would it mean that the Taliban aren't graduating, or haven't been graduating since 2001 or even before? Would that mean that there were no Jihadist graduates already heading to the West? Does it mean that this is the "only" graduation by the Taliban, other Jihadists around the world? Did we have to "see" that particular footage to "learn" that a Jihadi machine is producing "graduates" as we speak, even if they are not featured on ABC or al Jazeera? B) What if the Pastor hadn't met with the al Qaeda representative? Would that have meant that the Jihadists weren't marching and aren't willing to strike deep inside the West? With great sympathies to the cleric who should be thanked for reporting this, was that a "new" revelation? We have the leaders of al Qaeda informing us every few months on al Jazeera and online, and a daily wave of chat rooms statements enlightening us on the "blessed strike to come." Why aren't we taking that seriously until a "personal story" occurs somewhere? Don't we know that there is a standing order by al Qaeda to strike when and where possible? C) Did we have to wait for the British Jihadis to load two Mercedes and one Jeep and target a nightclub and an airport to "learn" that this is a possible tactic? Is this scenario that impossible to imagine and project? What did we learn from these tactics that we've already seen in the Sunni triangle in Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, Morocco, Algeria and Afghanistan? That it could happen in England too? So are there advisors in the West who are telling Governments and the public on both sides of the Atlantic that there is no such thing as "Jihad;" that there is no "war on terror;" that "it is about socio-economics?" So what have we learned tactically from the UK failed "raids?" What is it that our imagination has failed to predict, since the 9/11 Commission has told us that we have a "failed imagination"? D) Then we learn about the discovery of 45 doctors who planned for a Jihad in Jacksonville against a US base. What did we really discover here? That doctors can be Jihadists? Weren't we listening to (Doctor) Ayman Zawahiri for years and many other doctors in the region threatening with Terror? Haven't we seen in the 20th century’s darkest moments Nazi doctors involved in one of the most horrific genocides of all times? Or why were we surprised by the fact that Jihadists were planning on attacking a US base in the US homeland? Didn't we analyze enough the Fort Dix guys who were planning a similar attack on American soil against an Army base few weeks ago? Weren't the two Georgia young Jihadis, arrested last year, planning on striking at US military installations across the nation? In short, is that shocking to "learn" that the Jihadis are targeting our national defense? E) Last but not least, we are supposing that "al Qaeda likes to attack in the summer." So, should we discount attacks in the fall, winter and spring? I am not being sarcastic here but there is something strange about how we proceed in analyzing the Jihadi war against democracies and America, and how we break news to the public. On the one hand, the overwhelming majority of the academic elite, many in the political establishment and most of the mainstream media are desperately trying to demobilize their audiences by claiming that all what we see "is just a mirage." And on the other hand, the same media tell us that al Qaeda could be "attacking us this summer" because of a graduation, a Pastor's report, tactics we learned from London, doctors-turned-Jihadis, and summertime. With all these ingredients, the debate on Terrorism seems to be swinging between total denials on the one hand and blurry vision on the other hand. This summer and any other summer, and all other seasons by the way, are Jihadi times. We need to adapt to this reality for as long as this conflict is on. For al Qaeda and its allies, as well as the Khomeinists are on the path of war. And when they are in that mode, nothing should surprise us.▪ Al Qaeda has already established cells in the UK, the US and the West. If there is an "additional" cell coming this way, we would certainly be happier if the Government would have detected it and stop it. But it would be misleading the public to state that al Qaeda's second cell ever to infiltrate the country (after Mohammed Atta's in 2001) is "now" heading to our shores. ▪ The intention to penetrate our systems and to strike is as old as the Jihadi war against the West (that would be at least since the early 1990s). An al Qaeda representative in Iraq is not serving us with news if he "reveals" that the group will be spilling blood soon. ▪ Arresting the Terror-doctors is a positive development, but we shouldn't be in shock and awe about it. Our analysts and public educators should have (and some have) informed the public of the deep penetration that has been taken place within liberal democracies. We should learn form the infiltration of this particular segment of the medical field to preempt the penetration of other sectors, and of other fields as well. We should project that the Jihadists have infiltrated the engineering, computer, banking, security and other fields. ▪ Zawahiri's orders to strike inside the West and within the realm of moderate Arabs and Muslims are al Qaeda standing orders at least since 2001. His additional statements are reminders of what has already been a war waged at will and is taking place as its perpetrators are acquiring means and targets. ▪ Yes, it may be true that, statistically, most al Qaeda known attacks have taken place in the West between July and September, with the exception of Madrid's March 11, but there is no "Jihadi summertime." If and when these "forces" acquire targets and circumstances, they will most likely wait for warmer months to strike. So, if indeed evidence is gathering that al Qaeda is preparing for a series of attacks in the US in the next weeks and months, then it is important to inform and ready the public for it. But the media - and their sources - must help their audiences put the information in context. There is a Jihadi war on liberal democracies, including America, and a US-led campaign on Terror. The learning and educational processes must be set in this general direction, not in terms of an out-of-context sensationalism. For it would have been out of line if in 1942, spokespersons and reporters in Allied nations would have been announcing that "unidentified planes with Swastikas on their wings were dropping what we think could be bombs on European cities."


Commentary Herb A KrantzThis article bring to the for front how dangerous this world is. We can’t trust anyone who is a doctor computer specialist or Indian chief. Anyone who is from the Middle East or anywhere in the world can be a terrorist, with one whish and one wish only to kill anyone who does not believe as they do in Islam. Not the true Islam beliefs but their radical ones. The live to die, not to serve Alai as a messenger to the people of the living world.
The true meaning of the Islamic religion is not much different than any other religions. To leave and let live in harmony and peace
This has been going on for years and no one has had the initiative to try and stop it. Starting from way back even before the Afghani – Taliban war, Before Vietnam. The people who ran our government knew it but chose to turn the other way as they have many times before.
I hate to say it but since 911 I find myself subspecies of anyone who comes from the Asian and Arab countries. It’s not right but it’s something I find myself doing without thinking. I am afraid of what will happen next.
We all must be aware that this world will never be the same and because of our dear president we as Americans will never be looked upon the same way as we were.